Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Frequently asked questionsEverything you need to know about Site Spy，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
Китай может в ближайшее время начать оказывать помощь Ирану в противостоянии с США. Об этом сообщает CNN со ссылкой на источники, знакомые с ситуацией.。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
保险领域统一查询系统建设进展较好。如，组织部门为解决公职人员领导干部个人事项申报问题，依托中国银保信建设了行业统一的保险保单查询系统“金事通”，并在金融监管总局关于人身保险“睡眠保单”清理专项工作部署下，支撑了全国“睡眠保单”信息查询平台的建设和运营。。新收录的资料对此有专业解读